引用本文:[点击复制]
[点击复制]
【打印本页】 【在线阅读全文】【下载PDF全文】 查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器关闭

←前一篇|后一篇→

过刊浏览    高级检索

本文已被:浏览 1402次   下载 139 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
冗思反应量表中文版在抑郁障碍患者中的运用结果分析
王芹,朱熊兆,蚁金瑶,蔡琳,钟明洁,张逸,唐秋萍
0
()
摘要:
目的 评价冗思反应量表中文版(RRS-C)在抑郁障碍患者中的信、效度.方法 212例抑郁障碍患者完成了RRS-C和流调中心抑郁量表(CES- D),分析RRS-C的Cronbach'sα系数、条目间平均相关系数、总分和各因子的相关系数,并采用验证性因子分析考察其三因子结构.结果 RRS-C总量表的Cronbach's α系数为0.88,三因子的Cronbach's α系数在0.67~0.84;总量表的条目间平均相关系数为0.26,量表总分和各因子间的相关系数在0.71~0.94,各因子条目间平均相关系数在0.29~0.32;验证性因子分析指标(CFI=0.913;GFI=0.905;x2/v<2;RSMEA=0.072)均符合测量学要求.结论 RRS-C在抑郁障碍患者中有良好的信、效度,可应用于我国抑郁障碍患者冗思特征的测评.
关键词:  抑郁障碍  冗思  中文版  信度  效度
DOI:
基金项目:高等学校博士点专项科研基金新教师基金,国家"十一五"科技支撑计划
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of rumination response scale in depressed patients
()
Abstract:
Objective To examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Rumina- tion Response Scale(RRS--C) in Depressed patients. Methods A sample of 212 depressed patients was tested. The RRS--C's coefficient of Cronbaeh's a, mean inter--item correlation coefficient and score-- factor correlation coefficient were examined. Using confirmatory factor analysis,the three--factor Model was tested. Results The Cronbaeh's a coefficient of the RRS--C was 0.88. The Cronbaeh's a coefficients of 3 factors were among 0.67~0.84. The mean inter--item correlation coefficient of the RRS--C was 0.26. The intra--class correlation coefficients of RRS--C's three factors ranged from 0.71~0.94. The intra--class correlation coefficients of the 3 factors ranged from 0.29~0.32. The CFI= 0. 913, GFI= 0. 905, X2 /v~2, RSMEA= 0. 072, and all of them met the criteria standards for adequacy of fit. Conclusions The Chinese Version of Rumination Response Scale was of good reliability and validity in depression patients, which serves as an excellent measuring tool for assessing rumination in Chinese depression patients.
Key words:  Depressive disorder  Rumination  Chinese version  Reliability  Validity

用微信扫一扫

用微信扫一扫